Короткий опис(реферат):
Досліджено правову кваліфікацію збройного конфлікту в колишній Югославії.
Проаналізовано роль Ради Безпеки ООН у кваліфікації збройного конфлікту у Косово; на підставі
аналізу резолюцій Ради Безпеки ООН встановлено динаміку реагування Ради Безпеки на збройний
конфлікт у колишній Югославії у процесі його загострення.
Передумовою цього дослідження є те, що криза в Косово була важливою подією у сфері
права збройних конфліктів. Вона почалася як гуманітарна криза з біженцями, поширюючись із
Косова на сусідні регіони, особливо Албанію та колишню югославську республіку Македонія.
У цій статті розглядається jus in hello, а не jus ad helium. Але при оцінці вжитих
військових дій необхідно враховувати причину конфлікту. У цьому відношенні криза була
спричинена гуманітарною ситуацією, що мала важливий вплив на сусідні держави та на
регіональну стабільність. The article examines the legal qualification
of the armed conflict in the former Yugoslavia. The role of the UN Security Council in qualifying the
armed conflict in Kosovo is analyzed; based on the analysis of UN Security Council resolutions, the
dynamics of the Security Council s response to the armed conflict in the former Yugoslavia in the process
of its escalation was established.
The short but brutal conflict in Kosovo, which lasted from February 1998 to mid-June 1999,
became the source of long-standing debates among Western governments and the public about the
purpose and methods of collective military action. In view of the present Ukraine, the conflict that
erupted from a conflict of a non-international nature, we consider it necessary to turn in this publication to
the history of the conflict, which took place even in the 20th century, but on the scale of the existence of
states, recently. The war prompted Belgrade s efforts to purge the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia of all
non-Serb population. It was then that the first large-scale military action in the history of the NATO
alliance took place, which was a response to the lawlessness that took place.
The article becomes especially relevant given the sharp growth, after the end of the Cold
War , of the concern of the world community regarding the problems of International Humanitarian Law
and manifestations of the crime of genocide. International humanitarian law needs changes: to the general
principles, it is necessary to add definitions that will be both practically applied and empirically grounded,
and will also allow establishing the line at which genocide begins. Perhaps the war in Ukraine will be the
trigger, the starting point, which will allow the world community not only to define the concept, but also
to respond more quickly to such manifestations, directing aid to support the states that suffered as a result
of these actions.
