Abstract:
З’ясовано історичні передумови сучасного стану кримінального законодавства України у
частині регламентації ним кримінальної відповідальності за умисні вбивства, що зумовлює їх
потенційну кримінально-правову оцінку за сукупністю з іншими кримінальними
правопорушеннями. Аналіз розвитку нормативної регламентації відповідальності за умисне
вбивство у контексті їх потенційної множинності надав змогу зробити, зокрема, висновок, що
сучасний стан правової регламентації відповідальності за умисні вбивства у КК України 2001 р.
зумовлено історією розвитку вітчизняного кримінального законодавства, яке передбачало
посилене покарання за вчинення умисного вбивства у поєднанні з іншими кримінальними
правопорушеннями.
Description:
The classification
of intentional murders as a whole as a type of multiplicity of criminal offenses is a consequence of the
system of criminal legislation that was formed in Ukraine as a result of a certain historical path, the use of
traditional law-making techniques, and the reflection in the criminal legislation of the problems relevant
for a certain historical period of the development of Ukrainian society. Tracking this development makes
it possible to better understand the current state of criminal legislation in terms of criminal liability for
intentional homicides in terms of the historically determined features of its normative regulation. The
purpose of this article was to find out the historical prerequisites of the current state of the criminal
legislation of Ukraine in terms of its regulation of criminal liability for intentional murders, which
determines their potential criminal-legal assessment in combination with other criminal offenses. The
analysis of the development of the regulatory regulation of responsibility for intentional homicide in the
context of their potential multiplicity made it possible to draw the following conclusions.
The current state of legal regulation of responsibility for intentional homicide in the Criminal
Code of Ukraine of 2001, the use of legal constructions that determine the potential multiplicity of
criminal offenses during their criminal legal assessment, is determined by the history of the development
of domestic criminal legislation, which provided for increased punishment for intentional homicide in
combination with other criminal offenses. At the same time, the constructions used by the legislator to
regulate such cases became more complicated with the development of law-making techniques and
criminal legal doctrine. One of the main features of the development of this institution of criminal law is
the gradual systematization and ordering of criminal offenses, the commission of which, along with
murder, entails the application of appropriate measures of criminal law repression.
