Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://er.dduvs.in.ua/handle/123456789/5187
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorРезворович, К.Р.-
dc.contributor.authorRezvorovych, K.R.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-27T17:09:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-27T17:09:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationРезворович К.Р. Міжнародний досвід правового регулювання діяльності інститутів спільного інвестування / К.Р. Резворович // Науковий вісник Дніпропетровського державного університету внутрішніх справ. - 2020. - № 2 (105). - С. 110-114uk_UA
dc.identifier.otherУДК 351.75-
dc.identifier.urihttp://er.dduvs.in.ua/handle/123456789/5187-
dc.descriptionThis article defines the essence of collective investment institutions, analyses the experience of joint investment institutions in various countries. It is marked that the effectiveness of the activities of mutual investment institutions depends directly on the legal regulation of their activities, the establishment of a clear legal regime of activity of investment funds and companies in the securities market. Given the evolution of legal regulation of co-investment institutions in Ukraine, the experience of other countries in this field is interesting and useful. The formation of separate national markets for joint venture investment services took place under completely different historical conditions, under different legal regimes and types of financial systems. The analysis of the activities of joint venture institutions abroad shows that there are different models of joint venture institutions. If in the US the most popular way of investing is to buy shares of mutual funds (or open-end investment companies) and, in addition, to close closed-end investment companies, in the UK, the former were the so-called unit trusts (or unit trusts), and the second - investment funds. The investment sphere of the German economy is very specific in comparison with other countries. This is due to the special role of the banks that they play in it. It is worth noting that the positive factors of legal regulation become effective only if an effective system of joint investment institutions and a favorable investment climate in the country are created. It is important to ensure state support for existing and newly created joint investment institutions, especially in the field of introducing the most preferential taxation system. Third, the creation of conditions that would encourage individual investors to participate in the investment fund. First of all, it is about creating mechanisms for guaranteeing the rights of participants of joint investment institutions.uk_UA
dc.description.abstractПроаналізовано досвід функціонування інститутів спільного інвестування різних країн світу та наведено класифікацію різних форм здійснення спільного інвестування у світі. Розглянуто існуючі моделі розвитку ринків інститутів спільного інвестування.uk_UA
dc.language.isootheruk_UA
dc.publisherДДУВСuk_UA
dc.subjectінститут спільного інвестуванняuk_UA
dc.subjectкомпанія з управління активамиuk_UA
dc.subjectінвестиційні фондиuk_UA
dc.subjectтрастиuk_UA
dc.subjectjoint investment institutionsuk_UA
dc.subjecttrustsuk_UA
dc.subjectasset management companyuk_UA
dc.subjectinvestmentuk_UA
dc.subjectfundsuk_UA
dc.titleМіжнародний досвід правового регулювання діяльності інститутів спільного інвестуванняuk_UA
dc.title.alternativeInternational experience of legal regulation of joint investment institutionsuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Appears in Collections:Науковий вісник Дніпропетровського державного університету внутрішніх справ. - 2020. - № 2 (105)
Наукові статті
НАУКОВІ СТАТТІ
Резворович К.Р.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
11.pdf359,97 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.