Короткий опис(реферат):
У статті аргументовано вказано на значне перевантаження нормативного регулювання суспільних відносин з боку держави, що негативно впливає на його результативність, зокрема й на ефективність правоохоронної діяльності. Водночас неузгодженість законодавства не дає змогу вчасно реагувати на постійні зміни в суспільстві в спосіб прийняття нормативно-правових актів для врегулювання відносин, які виникли або змінили свою сутність. Акцентовано увагу на потребі перегляду нормативного регулювання правоохоронної діяльності щодо його розвантаження для спрощення порядку внесення
необхідних змін у разі виникнення такої потреби.
Суть розробки, основні результати:
New laws are adopted daily, dozens of regulatory acts (decrees, orders, letters, etc.) are issued. Often, separate procedures are not coordinated, not because they are poorly prepared, but because with so many acts and rates of development of society, as well as changes in its environment, it is impossible to reconcile them. The example with the Bitcoin cryptocurrency, which appeared in 2009, seems to be indicative, and our
legislator persistently “does not notice” it in the legal field. Even criminals have learned to use it to pay for goods and services prohibited in circulation (weapons, drugs, radioactive substances, etc.), they demand ransom in cryptocurrency, and the state ignores it. Many believe that the matter is a significant complication of relations, therefore their regulation must also be made difficult. But everything is just the opposite: we create complex legal constructions on simple relations between subjects in society. As a result, elementary relations do not withstand the pressure of norms and prescriptions accumulated from above, because of which a failure occurs: from ignoring to direct denial. Law enforcement in this case is no exception. Excessive bureaucratization of procedural procedures contributes to crime, because it allows persons who commit crimes to avoid punishment, while forming public distrust in the law enforcement system. Despite the frankly false path in ensuring the rights and freedoms of respectable citizens, the state continues to build legal constructions in the direction of protecting individuals who are reasonably suspected of committing a crime, giving them additional opportunities to escape punishment. There is nothing ideal in nature, and in principle there can be no ideal law, because social relations are constantly changing, transforming together with the society itself. At the same time, the tasks of the legislation are to adapt to changing public relations and transform with them. Moreover, legal constructions should allow an immediate reaction of legislation to social changes, and not after decades when such changes have lost their relevance.
